Git bisect won't help much for flaky tests... but maybe this bayesian approach can.

We're not helped much by our tools here... Clearly provenance needs to be double checked.

A reminder that this is an easy migration. Can also be towards you own instance of Forgejo of course.

Interesting trick in Got, using SSH certificates to prove the origin on commits. This feels a bit rough though, tooling has room for improvement.

This looks tempting. I guess I'll try this one instead of pre-commit when I get the chance.

Nice little git trick. We can all thank the CIA I guess?

A good reminder that Git doesn't force you to use a web application to collaborate on code.

This kind of migration is apparently easier than it sounds.

Very good move on their part. It's time more people do so. Beside, Forgejo (powering Codeberg) looks very interesting. I plan to play with it more next year.

Nice tour of LazyGit. I keep hearing good things about it, I should really try it.

A good reminder that you don't always need a full blown forge.

Git pre-commit hooks indeed bring nice benefits. Like everything else they're not a panacea though.

An old series of posts which highlights quite well why GitFlow can be a problem and that you likely want something simpler. Since I still find GitFlow often recommended as a knee-jerk reaction, this is a good article to have in hand.

A nice git trick, there are options between the global .gitignore file and the local ones in the repository.

Let's see if this gets merged. This could be interesting convenience.

Looking forward to Git LFS going away indeed.

Nice simple fix in Git but with a large impact on backups. A good proof that profiling and keeping an eye on algorithmic complexity can go a long way in improving software.

I often tumble on this. The two and three dots notations means different things between git log and git diff. It is a tad annoying.

Cool tip showing what can be done with got bare repositories.

Looks like a very comprehensive resource about Git.