This lawsuit and the first ruling are indeed very concerning. Let's hope we keep the Internet Archive alive, their work is invaluable.

For all the conversations about how chat GPT might displace jobs, there's a big untold: how much of copyright is violated in the process? It's also very concerning about how much data it collects when interacted with.

It seems this isn't necessary after all. At most if you like it you can put the year of creation of the copyrighted content, but the range and bumping it really isn't necessary.

Alright, this going to be interesting. Pass me the pop corn. It's definitely a welcome move in any case.

Excellent news, hoping to see more such bogus patents cancelled. Also, one can hope, that patent offices would start becoming less sloppy...