Nice quality of life improvements for the history rewrites. That said, I'm particularly looking forward to the changes in hooks handling, it's always been a pain to deal with in teams, moving them to config should help.
People are manipulating vanity metrics to attract VC money? Who would have expected? This is so unsurprising, I don't even understand why people look at those...
Clearly, any endeavour which has to scale will need some form of bureaucracy to stay afloat. The art is keeping it to a minimal before it starts to be an end in itself.
The insurances are starting to crumble under the risks. Looks like it's time to do something about it.
OK, I find it funny. That said, there's a kernel of truth in this piece: there's clearly a taxonomy of bugs and you better know on what you just stepped.
Indeed, architecture work is not only technical (what is really?). You definitely need to account for the organisation and the process to actually put the architecture in place. It's not just about having pretty pictures.
Pausing a game is not as simple as it sounds. There are many approaches to it.
And this is why... we now have chickens. More seriously it's a true testament to genetic and behavioral diversity. This is clearly what allowed some species to escape the disaster.
Finer grained borrowing is still something people need in Rust. Here is a potential solution to get them today.
One of the dark sides of our industry, and this is is accelerating at a worrying pace. Maybe it's time to look at and fix the whole hardware life cycle?
When possible it's nice to nest your error types, this allows better investigation when something fails.
Looks like a small syntax adjustment, but that indeed open the door to nice improvements.
The FSF is now weighting in on the Euro-Office vs OnlyOffice situation. You have to respect the spirit of the AGPL and can't take away freedom with extra clauses. Seems to make sense to me.
This looks like an interesting agreement. E2EE messaging anyone? There is more of course, but I'm especially excited regarding this one.
Probably not... This is really taking a long time to be adopted. It's not an incremental thing at all, this doesn't help.
Are we surprised it's mostly a PR stunt? Not at all. Of course, I agree a lot with the conclusion: we can't trust any claim from those companies. They try to present themselves as labs but mostly try to disguise marketing as research...
Interesting piece, shows quite well how new technologies get in the home and then slowly expand. In the case of the Internet, it was indeed literally in a corner of the home before slowly being woven in our lives.
Stop looking at the shiny toy, remember the ethics behind them...
It's first a great marketing stunt. The model is likely not the secret sauce though.
This is indeed a nice pattern for dependency injection in C++ for global functions.